Loading...
Loading...
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, context window, latency, and benchmark performance. Data refreshed daily from provider APIs and ModelStop's own latency probes.
⚡gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 is 34ms faster than gpt-5.2-chat-latest
📈gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 scores 1270.0 pts higher on benchmarks
Price (lower is better), Speed/Latency (lower is better), Performance (higher is better)
| Spec | gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 | gpt-5.2-chat-latest |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | openai | openai |
| Input price / 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Output price / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Latency (p50) | — | 34ms |
| Best benchmark score | 1270.0 | — |
| Open source | No | No |
This multimodal model excels at processing and generating both text and audio, making it ideal for developers and applications requiring real-time voice interactions, transcription, audio analysis, and spoken responses without separate API calls.
I don't have reliable information about a model called "gpt-5.2-chat-latest" as it doesn't appear to be a current or publicly documented OpenAI model, so I cannot provide an accurate description without risking misinformation.
Want to swap in a different model or estimate monthly costs?
Help my team choose the right model
Not sure which model fits your workload, budget, and latency requirements? Get a tailored recommendation.