Loading...
Loading...
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, context window, latency, and benchmark performance. Data refreshed daily from provider APIs and ModelStop's own latency probes.
⚡gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 is 42ms faster than gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-03-20
📈gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 scores 1270.0 pts higher on benchmarks
Price (lower is better), Speed/Latency (lower is better), Performance (higher is better)
| Spec | gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 | gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-03-20 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | openai | openai |
| Input price / 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Output price / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Latency (p50) | — | 42ms |
| Best benchmark score | 1270.0 | — |
| Open source | No | No |
This multimodal model excels at processing and generating both text and audio, making it ideal for developers and applications requiring real-time voice interactions, transcription, audio analysis, and spoken responses without separate API calls.
This compact multimodal model excels at real-time speech transcription and audio processing tasks, making it ideal for developers building cost-effective voice applications, accessibility features, and audio-to-text solutions that require lower latency and reduced computational resources compared to full-scale models.
Want to swap in a different model or estimate monthly costs?
Help my team choose the right model
Not sure which model fits your workload, budget, and latency requirements? Get a tailored recommendation.