Loading...
Loading...
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, context window, latency, and benchmark performance. Data refreshed daily from provider APIs and ModelStop's own latency probes.
📈gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 scores 1270.0 pts higher on benchmarks
Price (lower is better), Speed/Latency (lower is better), Performance (higher is better)
| Spec | gpt-4o-audio-preview-2024-12-17 | gpt-4o-mini-audio-preview-2024-12-17 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | openai | openai |
| Input price / 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Output price / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Context window | — | — |
| Latency (p50) | — | — |
| Best benchmark score | 1270.0 | — |
| Open source | No | No |
This multimodal model excels at processing and generating both text and audio, making it ideal for developers and applications requiring real-time voice interactions, transcription, audio analysis, and spoken responses without separate API calls.
This lightweight, multimodal model excels at processing text, images, and audio inputs with fast response times and lower costs, making it ideal for developers and organizations building real-time conversational applications, content analysis tools, and interactive voice assistants where efficiency and affordability are priorities.
Want to swap in a different model or estimate monthly costs?
Help my team choose the right model
Not sure which model fits your workload, budget, and latency requirements? Get a tailored recommendation.