Loading...
Loading...
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, context window, latency, and benchmark performance. Data refreshed daily from provider APIs and ModelStop's own latency probes.
⚡OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is 923ms faster than gpt-oss-120b
Price (lower is better), Speed/Latency (lower is better), Performance (higher is better)
OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is 4195% faster
| Spec | gpt-oss-120b | OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | openai | openai |
| Input price / 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Output price / 1M tokens | — | — |
| Context window | 128k tokens | 16k tokens |
| Latency (p50) | 945ms | 22ms |
| Best benchmark score | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
OpenAI’s open-weight models designed for powerful reasoning, agentic tasks, and versatile developer use cases – gpt-oss-120b is for production, general purpose, high reasoning use-cases.
This model offers four times the context length of gpt-3.5-turbo, allowing it to support approximately 20 pages of text in a single request at a higher cost. Training data: up...
Want to swap in a different model or estimate monthly costs?
Help my team choose the right model
Not sure which model fits your workload, budget, and latency requirements? Get a tailored recommendation.